Interview 27
1st child was breech, had planned caesarean. Struggled to breastfeed and felt low for long after. Wanted planned CS with 2nd child, but felt pushed into VBAC by clinicians. Went into labour early and had emergency CS at 38 weeks, found experience worse than previous.
No details given.
More about me...
First pregnancy and birth
Her first pregnancy was planned. She had low blood pressure and painful false labour (Braxton Hicks) throughout, but no other complications. At the 20 week scan she found out that her baby was in a breech position and advised to have a planned caesarean. The hospital did not offer the option of having the baby turned manually and after reading up on breech babies, she herself also felt that ECV (external cephalic version) might be too risky. She tried several other tips and tricks that she had found in books and on the internet, but her baby didn't turn. She attended antenatal classes, but found them of limited use, as by that point she felt quite certain that she would not go through labour and vaginal birth. Caesarean was only covered very superficially and most of the information that she had about it before her operation she had to find by herself. She had a good relationship with her midwives, but would have preferred to see the same person each time.
Her caesarean was scheduled for 8 days before her due date. The procedure was quick and smooth and her daughter was born healthily. After the caesarean, she felt disappointed that she had not been able to have her child 'the intended way' and was sad that she did had missed out on what she imagined to be a more immediate bonding experience after vaginal birth. She had been very keen to breastfeed her daughter, and her difficulty to do so further contributed to her low mood. She ended up expressing breast milk for 1 month instead. Her recovery was slow. She contracted a uterine infection and her scar was very painful for six weeks. She experienced depression for a year after her daughter was born, but gradually recovered with the help of anti-depressants and counselling.
Second pregnancy and birth
Her second pregnancy was more difficult than her first one. She had low blood pressure and painful false labour again, but also experience increased dizziness and nausea. As her bump grew, the area around her scar became very tender and she had to go into hospital a couple of times to have it checked out. She only started thinking about how she wanted to deliver her second child after the 20 week scan. Up until then she had felt convinced that her baby would be in a breech position again and she would have no choice but to have another caesarean. Her baby turned out to be head down and she felt pushed by her doctor and midwives to have a vaginal birth. However, the information she received about how her labour would be managed was vague and conflicting. Additional information she got through taking part in the DiAMOND trial made her aware that her own preferences about how to give birth should be taken into account. Making the decision was difficult. After considering all the risks and benefits of different ways of giving birth and taking into account that her baby was bigger than average, she decided to book a planned caesarean. Her husband supported her in communicating her wish not to attempt vaginal birth even if she should go into labour early to medical staff.
Her caesarean had been scheduled for 3 days before her due date. During week 38, she woke up in the night with what she thought were tummy pains. When the pain grew stronger, she phoned up the hospital and was told to come in. Her waters broke and she was found to be 3cms dilated. The monitors showed that her baby was experiencing distress, and she was rushed into the operating theatre for an emergency caesarean. The epidural she received did not work as well as with her first caesarean. The needle hit a nerve and caused lasting numbness in her left knee. The caesarean itself was over quickly, but very different to how she had imagined it to be. She did not feel involved in what was happening at all and found that staff were talking amongst themselves rather than to her. Afterwards, as the hospital was very busy, she had to stay in a makeshift recovery room for 6 hours. As her uterus did not contract, she received two courses of antibiotics. She experienced a lot of pain and needed to stay in hospital for 3 days. She attempted to breastfeed her son, but struggled to produce enough milk, which she attributes to being in the stressful hospital environment. She eventually bottle-fed her son, but was made to feel guilty by the disapproving reactions of hospital staff.
Comparing her first and her second caesarean, she experienced a lot more pain and stress with her second, emergency, delivery. The fact that her baby was showing signs of distress made the delivery quite traumatic, and understaffing at the hospital made for a difficult recovery. She would have liked to talk about what had happened to a midwife or doctor, but was not offered that opportunity. After returning home, she felt very low. After consultation with her GP she decided to go back on anti-depressants and has felt a lot better since. She would advise other women to seek out their own information rather than rely on the guidance of health professionals as she thinks all too often their recommendations are based on general policies and do not take into account the needs of the individual patient.