Patricia
Age at interview: 69
Brief Outline: In January 2013, Patricia dislocated her right shoulder after she fell down some steps. In A&E, they relocated her shoulder and she was told that the dislocation could have damaged the nerves that are situated under the shoulder. Indeed, she started having problems moving her arm, hand, and wrist and fingers. On the 23 June 2014, she had subacromial decompression surgery, but feels surgery has not worked for her, as her mobility has not improved and she continues having pain. At her post-op follow up appointment she was told it is early days and was referred for more physiotherapy. The consultant will revise her situation in three months’ time.
Background: Patricia is married and has three adult children. Retired social worker. Ethnic background: British.
More about me...
In January 2013, Patricia dislocated her right shoulder after she fell down some steps. In A&E, they relocated her shoulder and she was told that the dislocation could have damaged the nerves that are situated under the shoulder. Indeed, she started having problems moving her arm, hand, wrist and fingers.
A week after her accident, she saw a consultant at her local hospital and was referred to the hand clinic. In March 2013, she had a nerve test to ascertain the damage sustained to the hand, wrist and arm. And in May 2013, the local consultant referred her to see a specialist in a regional hospital. The specialist thought that she would improve but that it was going to take time. She had another nerve test and went back to see the specialist back in July who suggested she may have rotator cuff damage in her right shoulder. She was referred back to her local hospital where she had an MRI scan in August 2013, but neither she nor her GP received a report on the findings. She eventually got a copy of her MRI report from her physiotherapist.
In October 2013, Patricia went back to see the hand specialist and learned that she had not been sent a copy of her MRI scan results. She and her husband had brought their own copy and so the consultant was able to explain to them her test’s results. Basically, the scan showed she had impingement syndrome of full thickness tear of two tendons; a partial tear of a sub tendon and mild to moderate atrophy of two main muscles and damage to the biceps tendon.
When it was established that there was something wrong with her shoulder, Patricia was referred to the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, an NHS hospital but she had to wait a long time to get an appointment. Finally, in March 2014 she saw a shoulder specialist and she had surgery in June 2014.
After the operation, one of the doctors explained that the MRI result had misled them because, during surgery, they found that there was no tear but thinning of the tendon muscle, which was still attached to the rotator cuff. They found holes in the tendon, but there was not enough of it to cut and reconnect to the rotator cuff. Surgeons conducted the decompression surgery and removed the long head of biceps tendon to decrease the likelihood of pain.
As the hand specialist predicted, Patricia has had a good recovery of the nerve supply to the hand and fingers but, since her decompression surgery she feels her hand had got stiffer. She continues to have restricted upward arm movement and her shoulder is painful if she tries to move her arm beyond a certain point.
Patricia feels she hasn’t had any benefit at all from her decompression surgery. The written report from her post-op follow-up appointment recommends more physiotherapy to deal with her shoulder stiffness and indicates that her restricted mobility could also be related to the nerve block used during surgery. She is seeing the consultant again in three months’ time. Specialists have suggested to Patricia that it is still early days since her operation and that hopefully physiotherapy will improve things. She and her husband feel they have been put ‘on hold’ again.
Throughout this period Patricia has coped, with the support of her husband who helps with house chores and has accompanied her to all her GP and hospitals appointments.
Patricia commented on the financial cost involved in attending non-local hospitals such as the payment of costly long-stay car parks and overnight stay expenses when attending early appointments.
Overall, Patricia and her husband feel that time was lost due to long waits to see specialists and poor communication between different hospitals and departments. Also, they think that the MRI test should have been done earlier and not seven months after her accident.
A week after her accident, she saw a consultant at her local hospital and was referred to the hand clinic. In March 2013, she had a nerve test to ascertain the damage sustained to the hand, wrist and arm. And in May 2013, the local consultant referred her to see a specialist in a regional hospital. The specialist thought that she would improve but that it was going to take time. She had another nerve test and went back to see the specialist back in July who suggested she may have rotator cuff damage in her right shoulder. She was referred back to her local hospital where she had an MRI scan in August 2013, but neither she nor her GP received a report on the findings. She eventually got a copy of her MRI report from her physiotherapist.
In October 2013, Patricia went back to see the hand specialist and learned that she had not been sent a copy of her MRI scan results. She and her husband had brought their own copy and so the consultant was able to explain to them her test’s results. Basically, the scan showed she had impingement syndrome of full thickness tear of two tendons; a partial tear of a sub tendon and mild to moderate atrophy of two main muscles and damage to the biceps tendon.
When it was established that there was something wrong with her shoulder, Patricia was referred to the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, an NHS hospital but she had to wait a long time to get an appointment. Finally, in March 2014 she saw a shoulder specialist and she had surgery in June 2014.
After the operation, one of the doctors explained that the MRI result had misled them because, during surgery, they found that there was no tear but thinning of the tendon muscle, which was still attached to the rotator cuff. They found holes in the tendon, but there was not enough of it to cut and reconnect to the rotator cuff. Surgeons conducted the decompression surgery and removed the long head of biceps tendon to decrease the likelihood of pain.
As the hand specialist predicted, Patricia has had a good recovery of the nerve supply to the hand and fingers but, since her decompression surgery she feels her hand had got stiffer. She continues to have restricted upward arm movement and her shoulder is painful if she tries to move her arm beyond a certain point.
Patricia feels she hasn’t had any benefit at all from her decompression surgery. The written report from her post-op follow-up appointment recommends more physiotherapy to deal with her shoulder stiffness and indicates that her restricted mobility could also be related to the nerve block used during surgery. She is seeing the consultant again in three months’ time. Specialists have suggested to Patricia that it is still early days since her operation and that hopefully physiotherapy will improve things. She and her husband feel they have been put ‘on hold’ again.
Throughout this period Patricia has coped, with the support of her husband who helps with house chores and has accompanied her to all her GP and hospitals appointments.
Patricia commented on the financial cost involved in attending non-local hospitals such as the payment of costly long-stay car parks and overnight stay expenses when attending early appointments.
Overall, Patricia and her husband feel that time was lost due to long waits to see specialists and poor communication between different hospitals and departments. Also, they think that the MRI test should have been done earlier and not seven months after her accident.