David
Age at interview: 63
Brief Outline: He had a minor stroke in 2001 and spent 3 days in hospital. He is allergic to aspirin and it took time after the stroke to find a blood thinning drug that he could tolerate. He asked to be tested for diabetes because of his family history; he started on insulin 2 years ago.
Background: David is widowed with one child. He is a retired tax specialist. Ethnic Background: White.
More about me...
Because of his family history, David asked to be tested for diabetes:
“I asked to be tested and I was substantially diabetic and the clinic ummed and aarhed and eventually decided that I must be type two, rather than type one, though I’ve never been convinced they were doing anything other than following the easiest path”.
David feels fit enough to be as active as he wants, although having to remember to take insulin and associated gear with him wherever he goes is seen as a “tie”. David sees his diabetes and the stroke as unconnected. He thinks that the reason why he had a stroke is “an unknown”.
In David’s account we find a description of how different medical professionals have to collaborate and how they prioritise, e.g. sort the blood pressure first, then the diabetes. Most of his interaction is with a diabetic clinic, but prescribing is controlled by his GP. In his view, it would be better if the person he was seeing had the power to prescribe. However, whilst preferring “one port of call” he does not see his GP as being expert in either condition.
David’s advice for patients is: “keep taking the tablets etcetera [laughs]. And if you have a side effect, go to your doctor [laughs] and come off, and hopefully come off the one that’s causing the problem.”
“I asked to be tested and I was substantially diabetic and the clinic ummed and aarhed and eventually decided that I must be type two, rather than type one, though I’ve never been convinced they were doing anything other than following the easiest path”.
David feels fit enough to be as active as he wants, although having to remember to take insulin and associated gear with him wherever he goes is seen as a “tie”. David sees his diabetes and the stroke as unconnected. He thinks that the reason why he had a stroke is “an unknown”.
In David’s account we find a description of how different medical professionals have to collaborate and how they prioritise, e.g. sort the blood pressure first, then the diabetes. Most of his interaction is with a diabetic clinic, but prescribing is controlled by his GP. In his view, it would be better if the person he was seeing had the power to prescribe. However, whilst preferring “one port of call” he does not see his GP as being expert in either condition.
David’s advice for patients is: “keep taking the tablets etcetera [laughs]. And if you have a side effect, go to your doctor [laughs] and come off, and hopefully come off the one that’s causing the problem.”